Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

SPOKEO, INC v. ROBINS

Docket No.: 13-1339
Certiorari Granted: 04/27/15
Argued: November 2, 2015

Topics:

Americans with Disabilities Act, Article I, Civil Procedure, Consumer Protection, ERISA, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Housing Act, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Natural Resources, Privacy Act, Truth in Lending, background checks, copyright, credit reports, immigration, interstate commerce, privacy, property rights, public action, res judicata, statutory standing, willful violation, willfulness

PartyNames: Spokeo, Inc. v. Thomas Robins
Petitioner: Spokeo, Inc.
Respondent: Thomas Robins

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 742 F.3d 409
Supreme Court Docket

Spokeo, Inc.
v.
Thomas Robins
Question Presented:

Whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff who suffers no concrete harm, and who therefore could not otherwise invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court, by authorizing a private right of action based on a bare violation of a federal statute.

SPOKEO, INC v. ROBINS
ORAL ARGUMENT

November 2, 2015

Listen to Oral Argument in SPOKEO, INC v. ROBINS
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)