Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Ohio v. Clark

Docket No.: 13-1352
Certiorari Granted: Oct 2 2014
Argued: March 2, 2015
Decided: 6/18/15

Topics:

Confrontation Clause, Miranda, Sixth Amendment, criminal procedure

PartyNames: Ohio v. Darius Clark
Petitioner: Ohio
Respondent: Darius Clark

Court Below: Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation: 999 N.E.2d 592
Supreme Court Docket

Ohio
v.
Darius Clark
Question Presented:

1. Does an individual's obligation to report suspected child abuse make that individual an agent of law enforcement for purposes of the Confrontation Clause? 2. Do a child's out-of-court statements to a teacher in response to the teacher's concerns about potential child abuse qualify as "testimonial" statements subject to the Confrontation Clause?

Ohio v. Clark
ORAL ARGUMENT

March 2, 2015

Listen to Oral Argument in Ohio v. Clark
Holding: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Opinion By:
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)