Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA

Docket No.: 12-7822
Certiorari Granted: May 20 2013
Argued: November 13, 2013

Topics:

Fourth Amendment, privacy, probable cause, property rights

PartyNames: Walter Fernandez v. California
Petitioner: Walter Fernandez
Respondent: California

Court Below: Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
Citation: 208 Cal.App.4th 100
Supreme Court Docket

Walter Fernandez
v.
California
Question Presented:

Proper interpretation of Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006), specifically whether a defendant must be personally present and objecting when police officers ask a co-tenant for consent to conduct a warrantless search or whether a defendant's previously-stated objection, while physically present, to a warrantless search is a continuing assertion of 4th Amendment rights which cannot be overridden by a co-tenant.

FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA
ORAL ARGUMENT

November 13, 2013

Listen to Oral Argument in FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA

Warning: Use of undefined constant caseTitle - assumed 'caseTitle' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/supremec/public_html/supremecourtobserver.com/code/sofunctionsndb.php on line 1147

FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA
Case Documents

1FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA Oral Argument Transcript (PDF)
2FERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA Oral Argument Audio