Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:



Docket No.: 12-462
Certiorari Granted: May 20 2013
Argued: December 3, 2013


ADA, preemption

PartyNames: Northwest, Inc., et al. v. Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg
Petitioner: Northwest, Inc., et al.
Respondent: Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 695 F.3d 873
Supreme Court Docket

Northwest, Inc., et al.
Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg

The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 ("ADA") includes a preemption provision providing that States "may not enact or enforce a law, regulation or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier." 49 U.S.C. ยง 41713(b). Respondent was a participant in Northwest Airlines' frequent flyer program, which by its terms permitted Northwest to remove participants from the program in Northwest's "sole judgment." After respondent was removed from the frequent flyer program, he filed suit against Northwest alleging, inter alia, that Northwest breached both its contractual obligations and an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under Minnesota law when it exercised its discretion to terminate respondent's membership in the program. Although the district court dismissed the contract claim for failure to state a claim and the implied covenant of good faith claim as preempted by the ADA, the Ninth Circuit reversed as to the implied covenant claim, finding such claims categorically unrelated to a price, route or service under a line of Ninth Circuit cases that have been recognized by other Circuits as inconsistent with this Court's precedents, especially American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens, 513 U.S. 219 (1995).

Question Presented:

Did the court of appeals err by holding, in conflict with the decisions of other Circuits, that respondent's implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claim was not preempted under the ADA because such claims are categorically unrelated to a price, route, or service, notwithstanding that respondent's claim arises out of a frequent flyer program (the precise context of Wolens) and manifestly enlarged the terms of the parties' voluntary undertakings, which allowed termination in Northwest's sole discretion.


December 3, 2013

Listen to Oral Argument in NORTHWEST, INC. v. GINSBERG

Warning: Use of undefined constant caseTitle - assumed 'caseTitle' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/supremec/public_html/supremecourtobserver.com/code/sofunctionsndb.php on line 1147

Case Documents

1NORTHWEST, INC. v. GINSBERG Oral Argument Audio
2NORTHWEST, INC. v. GINSBERG Oral Argument Transcript (PDF)