Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

HOLLINGSWORTH v. PERRY

Docket No.: 12-144
Certiorari Granted: Dec 7 2012
Argued: March 26, 2013
Decided: June 26, 2013

Topics:

Article I, Due Process, Equal Protection Clause, Fourteenth Amendment, Natural Resources, patent, privacy, public action, racial segregation, separation of powers, suspect class, suspectedness

PartyNames: Dennis Hollingsworth, et al. v. Kristin M. Perry, et al.
Petitioner: Dennis Hollingsworth, et al.
Respondent: Kristin M. Perry, et al.

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 671 F.3d 1052
Supreme Court Docket

Dennis Hollingsworth, et al.
v.
Kristin M. Perry, et al.
Question Presented:

Whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the State of California from defining marriage as the* union of a man and a woman.

Note:

IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTION PRESENTED BY THE PETITION, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER PETITIONERS HAVE STANDING UNDER ARTICLE III, ยง2 OF THE CONSTITUTION IN THIS CASE. CERT. GRANTED 12/7/201212-144 HOLLINGSWORTH V. PERRY

HOLLINGSWORTH v. PERRY
ORAL ARGUMENT

March 26, 2013

Listen to Oral Argument in HOLLINGSWORTH v. PERRY
Holding: VACATED AND REMANDED
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)