Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

SHELBY COUNTY, AL v. HOLDER

Docket No.: 12-96
Argued: February 27, 2013
Decided: June 25, 2013

Topics:

ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, Article I, EPA, Equal Protection Clause, Fifteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Supremacy Clause, Tenth Amendment, Twenty-Sixth Amendment, Voting Rights Act of 1965, disparate treatment, judicial review, murder, preliminary injunction, racial discrimination, sovereign immunity, stare decisis

PartyNames: Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
Petitioner: Shelby County, Alabama
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Citation: 679 F.3d 848
Supreme Court Docket

Shelby County, Alabama
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
Consideration Limited:

GRANTED LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER CONGRESS' DECISION IN 2006 TO REAUTHORIZE SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT UNDER THE PRE-EXISTING COVERAGE FORMULA OF SECTION 4(b) OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT EXCEEDED ITS AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH AMENDMENTS AND THUS VIOLATED THE TENTH AMENDMENT AND ARTICLE IV OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

Question Presented:

Whether Congress' decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fifteenth Amendment and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.

SHELBY COUNTY, AL v. HOLDER
ORAL ARGUMENT

February 27, 2013

Listen to Oral Argument in SHELBY COUNTY, AL v. HOLDER
Holding: REVERSED
Vote: 5-4
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)