Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES

Docket No.: 11-9307
Certiorari Granted: Jun 25 2012
Argued: November 28, 2012
Decided: 2/20/13

Topics:

Armed Career Criminal Act, Commerce Clause, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Sixth Amendment, criminal procedure, disparate treatment, habeas, habeas corpus, judicial review, qualified immunity, sentencing guidelines, stare decisis

PartyNames: Armarcion D. Henderson v. United States
Petitioner: Armarcion D. Henderson
Respondent: United States

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Citation: 646 F.3d 223
Supreme Court Docket

Armarcion D. Henderson
v.
United States
Question Presented:

Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits an appellate court to correct a trial court's "plain error" despite the lack of an objection in the trial court. In Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), this Court held that, when the governing law on an issue is settled against the defendant at the time of trial but then changes in the defendant's favor by the time of appeal, "it is enough that an error be 'plain' at the time of appellate consideration." Id. at 468. Johnson did not address the timing of plain-error review when the governing law on an issue is unsettled at trial but clarified in the defendant's favor while his appeal is pending. The courts of appeals have split 5 to 3 on the question that Johnson left open. That question, which this case squarely presents, is: When the governing law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled in the defendant's favor by the time of appeal, should an appellate court reviewing for "plain error" apply Johnson's time-of-appeal standard, as the First, Second, Sixth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits do, or should the appellate court apply the Ninth Circuit's time-of-trial standard, which the D.C. Circuit and the panel below have adopted?

HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES
ORAL ARGUMENT

November 28, 2012

Listen to Oral Argument in HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES
Holding: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Opinion By:
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)