Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

AMGEN v. CONNECTICUT RETIREMENT PLANS

Docket No.: 11-1085
Certiorari Granted: Jun 11 2012
Argued: November 5, 2012
Decided: February 27, 2013

Topics:

Civil Procedure, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, antitrust

PartyNames: Amgen Inc., et al. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Petitioner: Amgen Inc., et al.
Respondent: Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 660 F.3d 1170
Supreme Court Docket

Amgen Inc., et al.
v.
Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Question Presented:

1. Whether, in a misrepresentation case under SEC Rule 10b-5, the district court must require proof of materiality before certifying a plaintiff class based on the fraud-on-themarket theory. 2. Whether, in such a case, the district court must allow the defendant to present evidence rebutting the applicability of the fraud-on-the-market theory before certifying a plaintiff class based on that theory.

Note:

JUSTICE BREYER TOOK NO PART

AMGEN v. CONNECTICUT RETIREMENT PLANS
ORAL ARGUMENT

November 5, 2012

Listen to Oral Argument in AMGEN v. CONNECTICUT RETIREMENT PLANS
Holding: AFFIRMED
Vote: 6-3
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)