Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Docket No.: 11-770
Certiorari Granted: Jun 4 2012
Argued: October 30, 2012
Decided: February 19, 2013

Topics:

18 U.S.C. 922, Fifth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, IPO, Miranda, Sixth Amendment, ineffective assistance of counsel, privacy, probable cause, search and seizure, self-incrimination, traffic stops

PartyNames: Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo v. United States
Petitioner: Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo
Respondent: United States

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Citation: 652 F.3d 197
Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Observer Blog Post for BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo
v.
United States
Question Presented:

Whether, pursuant to Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), police officers may detain an individual incident to the execution of a search warrant when the individual has left the immediate vicinity of the premises before the warrant is executed.

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES
ORAL ARGUMENT

October 30, 2012

Listen to Oral Argument in BAILEY v. UNITED STATES
Holding: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Vote: 6-3
For more coverage on BAILEY v. UNITED STATES please see our blog posting.
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)