Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Docket No.: 11-770
Certiorari Granted: Jun 4 2012
Argued: October 30, 2012
Decided: February 19, 2013

Topics:

18 U.S.C. 922, Fifth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, IPO, Miranda, Sixth Amendment, ineffective assistance of counsel, privacy, probable cause, search and seizure, self-incrimination, traffic stops

PartyNames: Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo v. United States
Petitioner: Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo
Respondent: United States

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Citation: 652 F.3d 197
Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Observer Blog Post for BAILEY v. UNITED STATES

Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo
v.
United States
Question Presented:

Whether, pursuant to Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), police officers may detain an individual incident to the execution of a search warrant when the individual has left the immediate vicinity of the premises before the warrant is executed.

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES
ORAL ARGUMENT

October 30, 2012

Listen to Oral Argument in BAILEY v. UNITED STATES
Holding: REVERSED AND REMANDED
Vote: 6-3
For more coverage on BAILEY v. UNITED STATES please see our blog posting.

BAILEY v. UNITED STATES
Case Documents

1BRIEF FOR PETITIONER
2Petition for Writ of Certiorari (PDF)
3BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
4BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FEDERAL DEFENDERS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
5BRIEF FOR THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, THE CATO INSTITUTE, AND THE NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER
6BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT
7BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE STATE OF MICHIGAN, TWENTY THREE (23) OTHER STATES, AND ONE (1) TERRITORY FOR RESPONDENT
8BAILEY v. UNITED STATES Oral Argument Transcript (PDF)
9BAILEY v. UNITED STATES Oral Argument Audio
10Slip Opinion in BAILEY v. UNITED STATES