Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

ROBERTS v. SEA-LAND SERVICES

Docket No.: 10-1399
Certiorari Granted: 09/27/11
Argued: January 11, 2012
Decided: 03/20/12

Topics:

Commerce Clause, Indians, Natural Resources, Title VII, disparate treatment

PartyNames: Dana Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.
Petitioner: Dana Roberts
Respondent: Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 625 F.3d 1204
Supreme Court Docket

Dana Roberts
v.
Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.
Background:

The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50 ("Longshore Act") provides generally for compensation for total disability in periodic payments at a rate of two-thirds of the "average weekly wage of the injured employee at the time of the injury," and for most partial disabilities the same fraction of the difference between that weekly wage and the worker's residual "wage-earning capacity." Id. §§ 8-10, 33 U.S.C. §§ 908-10. But it has always imposed upper and lower limits on the rate payable as so determined. Section 6(b) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 906(b), provides that the compensation rate cannot be more than twice "the applicable national average weekly wage," as determined for each fiscal year; nor can compensation for total disability be less than the lesser of half the "applicable national average weekly wage" so determined and the worker's full pre-injury earnings. The question which fiscal year's limits are the "applicable" ones is addressed by § 6(c): Determinations under subsection (b)(3) of this section with respect to a [fiscal year] shall apply to employees or survivors currently receiving compensation for permanent total disability or death benefits during such period, as well as those newly awarded compensation during such period. 33 U.S.C. § 906(c). The identity of the years whose limits are "applicable" under this provision has divided the two courts of appeals with the heaviest Longshore Act dockets. The questions presented are simple and straightforward:

Consideration Limited:

LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION

Question Presented:

1. Whether the phrase "those newly awarded compensation during such period" in Longshore Act § 6(c), applicable to all classes of disability except permanent total, can be read to mean "those first entitled to compensation during such period," regard-less of when it is awarded. 2. Whether the phrase "employees or survivors currently receiving compensation for permanent total disability or death benefits during such period" in § 6(c) can likewise be read to mean those "entitled to [such] compensation during such period," without reference to when it is received.

Question:

Under the Longshore Act, is the period when an individual is newly awarded compensation the fiscal year when an injured worker first becomes entitled to compensation or the fiscal year when the injured worker is actually awarded compensation?

ROBERTS v. SEA-LAND SERVICES
ORAL ARGUMENT

01/11/12

Listen to Oral Argument in ROBERTS v. SEA-LAND SERVICES
Holding: AFFIRMED
Vote: 8-1
Majority: Sotomayor,Roberts,Scalia,Kennedy,Thomas,Breyer,Alito,Kagan
Concurring: Ginsburg
Dissenting: Ginsburg
Opinion By:
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)