Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of N. Y.

Docket No.: 10-72
Certiorari Granted: 10/12/10
Argued: March 21, 2011
Decided: 01/10/11

Topics:

immunity from suit, sovereign immunity

PartyNames: Madison County, New York, et al. v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Petitioner: Madison County, New York, et al.
Respondent: Oneida Indian Nation of New York

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Citation: 605 F.3d 149
Supreme Court Docket

Madison County, New York, et al.
v.
Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Background:

In City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197, 214 (2005) ("Sherrill") this Court held that standards of federal Indian law and federal equity practice precluded the Oneida Indian Nation of New York ("0IN"), the same tribe here, from unilaterally reviving its ancient sovereignty, in whole or in part, over recently-purchased property that had been owned and governed by non-Indians for 200 years. In so holding, this Court expressly rejected the tribe's claim that its sovereign immunity prevented the City of Sherrill in Oneida County, New York, from collecting unpaid property taxes through foreclosure and eviction. Despite Sherrill, in these two related cases involving attempts by Madison County and Oneida County to foreclose on OIN-owned fee parcels for nonpayment of lawfully imposed taxes, the lower court held that the remedy of foreclosure is barred by tribal sovereign immunity from suit - a decision which two court of appeals judges expressly (and the third, in effect) implored this Court to review. The questions presented in this case are:

Question Presented:

1. whether tribal sovereign immunity from suit, to the extent it should continue to be recognized, bars taxing authorities from foreclosing to collect lawfully imposed property taxes. 2. whether the ancient Oneida reservation in New York was disestablished or diminished.

Note:

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR TOOK NO PART.

Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of N. Y.
ORAL ARGUMENT

03/21/11

Holding: vacated and remanded
Vote: 8-0
Recused: Sotomayor
Opinion By: Per Curiam
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)