Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Chase Bank USA v. McCoy

Docket No.: 09-329
Certiorari Granted: 06/21/10
Argued: December 8, 2010
Decided: 01/24/11

Topics:

Fair Labor Standards Act, Truth in Lending

PartyNames: Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. James A. McCoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner: Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Respondent: James A. McCoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 559 F.3d 963
Supreme Court Docket

Chase Bank USA, N.A.
v.
James A. McCoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Background:

The Federal Reserve Board's Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act, requires creditors to provide an initial disclosure statement, before any transaction on an open-end credit plan takes place, containing "each periodic rate that may be used to compute the finance charge." 12 C.F.R. § 226.6(a)(2). Regulation Z also requires that when a creditor later changes any term that it was required to disclose in the initial disclosure statement, the creditor must "mail or deliver written notice" of that change in terms before the effective date of the change. 12 C.F.R. § 226.9(c). Credit card issuing banks generally provide the requisite initial disclosures in or with the contract document that governs the credit card account. Such cardholder agreements commonly specify a standard periodic rate of interest and also that, if the cardholder defaults in a certain manner, then the creditor may increase the periodic rate on the account up to an identified default rate.

Question Presented:

When a creditor increases the periodic rate on a credit card account in response to a cardholder default, pursuant to a default rate term that was disclosed in the contract governing the account, does Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.9(c), require the creditor to provide the cardholder with a change-in-terms notice even though the contractual terms governing the account have not changed?

Question:

When a creditor increases the periodic rate on a credit card account in response to cardholder default, but pursuant to a default rate term disclosed in the contract governing the account, does Regulation Z of TILA require the creditor to provide the cardholder with a change-in-terms notice?

Chase Bank USA v. McCoy
ORAL ARGUMENT

12/08/10

Listen to Oral Argument in Chase Bank USA v. McCoy
Holding: reversed and remanded
Vote: 9-0
Opinion By:
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)