Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT

Docket No.: 08-1498
Certiorari Granted: 9/30/2009
Argued: February 23, 2010
Decided: June 21, 2010
Consolidated with: 09-899/30/2009:hether182339(a)(l),whichprohibitstheknowingprovisionof"any***service,***training,[or]expertadviceorassistance,"182339(b)(l),toadesignatedforeignterroristorganization,

Topics:

Article I, Death Penalty, Defamation, Due Process, Fifth Amendment, First Amendment, Natural Resources, Sixth Amendment, concerted activity, habeas, judicial review, preliminary injunction

PartyNames: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. v. Humanitarian Law Project, et al.
Petitioner: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
Respondent: Humanitarian Law Project, et al.

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 552 F.3d 916

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
v.
Humanitarian Law Project, et al.
Question Presented:

Whether 18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(l), which prohibits the knowing provision of "any * * * service, * * * training, [or] expert advice or assistance," 18 U.S.C. 2339A(b)(l), to a designated foreign terrorist organization, is unconstitutionally vague.

Note:

TH 09-89 FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT

HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT
ORAL ARGUMENT

February 23, 2010

Holding: affirmed in part, reversed in part, and
Vote: 6-3
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)