Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT

Docket No.: 08-1498
Certiorari Granted: 9/30/2009
Argued: February 23, 2010
Decided: June 21, 2010
Consolidated with: 09-899/30/2009:hether182339(a)(l),whichprohibitstheknowingprovisionof"any***service,***training,[or]expertadviceorassistance,"182339(b)(l),toadesignatedforeignterroristorganization,

Topics:

Article I, Death Penalty, Defamation, Due Process, Fifth Amendment, First Amendment, Natural Resources, Sixth Amendment, concerted activity, habeas, judicial review, preliminary injunction

PartyNames: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. v. Humanitarian Law Project, et al.
Petitioner: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
Respondent: Humanitarian Law Project, et al.

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 552 F.3d 916

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.
v.
Humanitarian Law Project, et al.
Question Presented:

Whether 18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(l), which prohibits the knowing provision of "any * * * service, * * * training, [or] expert advice or assistance," 18 U.S.C. 2339A(b)(l), to a designated foreign terrorist organization, is unconstitutionally vague.

Note:

TH 09-89 FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT

HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT
ORAL ARGUMENT

February 23, 2010

Holding: affirmed in part, reversed in part, and
Vote: 6-3

Warning: Use of undefined constant caseTitle - assumed 'caseTitle' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/supremec/public_html/supremecourtobserver.com/code/sofunctionsndb.php on line 1147

HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT
Case Documents

1Opinion in HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT
2HOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT Oral Argument Transcript (PDF)
Additional documents for this case are pending review.