Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:



Docket No.: 09-5201
Certiorari Granted: Nov 30 2009
Argued: March 30, 2010
Decided: June 7, 2010


Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Civil Rights Act, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Discrimination in Employment, Internal Revenue Code, Natural Resources, sentencing guidelines

PartyNames: Michael Gary Barber, et al. v. J. E. Thomas, Warden
Petitioner: Michael Gary Barber, et al.
Respondent: J. E. Thomas, Warden

Court Below: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citation: 533 F.3d 800

Michael Gary Barber, et al.
J. E. Thomas, Warden
Question Presented:

:flOmega The federal good time credit (GTC) statute provides for credits ''up to 54 days at the end of each year of the prisoner's term of imprisonment." Throughout federal sentencing statutes, and elsewhere in the same sentence, ''term of imprisonment" means the sentence imposed. However, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) interprets ''term of imprisonment" as unambiguously meaning time served. For each year of a sentence imposed, the BOP interpretation results in seven fewer days of available credits. The first question presented is:flOmega Does ''term of imprisonment" in Section 2l2(a)(2) of the Sentencing Reform Act, enacting 18 U.S.C. ยง 3624(b), unambiguously require the computation of good time credits on the basis of the sentence imposed? flOmega flOmega The Circuits, using a variety of rationales, have rejected the BOP's claim that the statute was unambiguous, but deferred to the BOP interpretation under Chevron based on "term of imprisonment" being ambiguous. In this litigation, the BOP has conceded that the regulation implementing the GTC statute, and previously accorded deference, was promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. Nevertheless, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the BOP rule under Skidmore. The second question presented is: flOmega If"term of imprisonment" in the federal good time credit statute is ambiguous, does the rule of lenity and the deference appropriate to the United States Sentencing Commission require that good time credits be awarded based on the sentence imposed?


March 30, 2010

Holding: affirmed
Vote: 6-3

Warning: Use of undefined constant caseTitle - assumed 'caseTitle' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/supremec/public_html/supremecourtobserver.com/code/sofunctionsndb.php on line 1147

Case Documents

1BARBER v. THOMAS Oral Argument Transcript (PDF)
2Opinion in BARBER v. THOMAS
Additional documents for this case are pending review.