Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

New Hampshire v. Maine

Docket No.: 130 ORIG
Argued: April 16, 2001
Decided: May 29, 2001

Topics:

Estoppel, Civil Procedure, res judicata

PartyNames: NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF MAINE
Petitioner: NOTICE: This opinion is subject to forma
Respondent: STATE OF MAINE

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to forma
v.
STATE OF MAINE
532 U.S. 742 (2001)
Other Citations: 121 S.Ct. 1808149 L.Ed.2d 968 (532 U.S.
Question:

Is New Hampshire's original suit against Maine, which disputes the Piscataqua River boundary, barred by earlier proceedings?

New Hampshire v. Maine
ORAL ARGUMENT

April 16, 2001

Decision: Decision: 8 votes for Maine, 0 vote(s) against
Recused: JUSTICE SOUTER

New Hampshire v. Maine
Case Documents

1Opinion in New Hampshire v. Maine
2Opinion in New Hampshire v. Maine
Additional documents for this case are pending review.