Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

Docket No.: 99-1030
Argued: October 3, 2000
Decided: November 28, 2000

Topics:

Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment, Criminal Procedure, Search and Seizure, Vehicles, Arbitration, Discrimination in Employment, EPA, Fourth Amendment, immigration, judicial review, murder, preliminary injunction, privacy, probable cause, search and seizure, searches and seizures, stare decisis, traffic stops

Petitioner: City of Indianapolis
Respondent: Edmond

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 183 F.3d 659
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket


531 U.S. 32 (2000)
Question:

Are highway checkpoint programs, whose primary purpose is the discovery and interdiction of illegal narcotics, consistent with the Fourth Amendment?

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
ORAL ARGUMENT

October 03, 2000

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 6 votes for Edmond, 3 vote(s) against

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
Case Documents

1Opinion in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
2Opinion in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
Additional documents for this case are pending review.