Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Artuz v. Bennett

Docket No.: 99-1238
Argued: October 10, 2000
Decided: November 7, 2000

Topics:

8 U.S.C. 2244, Criminal Procedure, Habeas Corpus, ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, Article I, Commerce Clause, Death Penalty, Eleventh Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, Fourteenth Amendment, age discrimination, habeas, habeas corpus, judicial review, murder, racial discrimination

Petitioner: Artuz
Respondent: Bennett

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Supreme Court Docket


531 U.S. 4 (2000)
Question:

Is an application for state postconviction relief containing procedurally barred claims properly filed within the meaning of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996?

Artuz v. Bennett
ORAL ARGUMENT

October 10, 2000

Decision: Decision: 9 votes for Bennett, 0 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)