Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Weisgram v. Marley

Docket No.: 99-161
Argued: January 18, 2000
Decided: February 22, 2000

Topics:

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court), Economic Activity, Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Jury Trial, Seventh Amendment

Petitioner: Weisgram
Respondent: Marley

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 169 F.3d 514
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket


528 U.S. 440 (2000)
Question:

May an appeals court order judgment as a matter of law after determining that a plaintiff's expert testimony should have been excluded at trial and that the remaining evidence was insufficient to support the verdict?

Weisgram v. Marley
ORAL ARGUMENT

January 18, 2000

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 9 votes for Marley, 0 vote(s) against

Weisgram v. Marley
Case Documents

1Opinion in Weisgram v. Marley
2Opinion in Weisgram v. Marley
Additional documents for this case are pending review.