Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Saenz v. Roe

Docket No.: 98-97
Argued: January 13, 1999
Decided: May 17, 1999

Topics:

Privileges and Immunities Clause, Civil Rights, ADEPA, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Article I, Article I of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Citizenship Clause, Civil Rights Act, Constitutional Law, Due Process, EPA, Equal Protection Clause, Federalism, Fourteenth Amendment, Medicaid, Privileges and Immunities Clause, Social Security Act, habeas, habeas corpus, patent, preliminary injunction, self-incrimination

Petitioner: Saenz
Respondent: Roe

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 134 F.3d 1400
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket


526 U.S. 489 (1999)
Question:

Does a state statute, authorizing states receiving Temporary Assistance to Needy Families to pay the benefit amount of another State's TANF to its first year residents, violate the Fourteenth Amendment's right-to-travel protections?

Saenz v. Roe
ORAL ARGUMENT

January 13, 1999

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 7 votes for Roe, 2 vote(s) against

Saenz v. Roe
Case Documents

1Opinion in Saenz v. Roe
2Opinion in Saenz v. Roe
Additional documents for this case are pending review.