Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Humana Inc. v. Forsyth

Docket No.: 97-303
Argued: November 30, 1998
Decided: January 20, 1999

Topics:

15 U.S.C. 1012, Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation, Civil Rights Act, Civil Rights Act of 1964, ERISA, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Fair Housing Act, Fair Labor Standards Act, National Labor Relations Act, RICO, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, Sherman Act, Title VII, preemption

Petitioner: Humana Inc.
Respondent: Forsyth

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 114 F.3d 1467
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket


525 U.S. 299 (1999)
Question:

May plaintiffs use the federal anti-racketeering law to sue their health insurers over alleged fraud?

Humana Inc. v. Forsyth
ORAL ARGUMENT

November 30, 1998

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 9 votes for Forsyth, 0 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)