Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University v. Homar

Docket No.: 96-651
Argued: March 24, 1997
Decided: June 9, 1997

Topics:

Due Process, Due Process, Due Process, Fourteenth Amendment, probable cause

PartyNames: James E. GILBERT, President, East Stroudsburg University, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard HOMAR.
Petitioner: Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University, et al.
Respondent: Hamar

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Citation: 89 F.3d 1009
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket

Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University, et al.
v.
Hamar
520 U.S. 924 (1997)
Other Citations: 117 S.Ct. 1807138 L.Ed.2d 120 (520 U.S.
Question:

Does a state institution violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by suspending a tenured employee without pay before holding a hearing in which the employee can voice objections?

Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University v. Homar
ORAL ARGUMENT

March 24, 1997

Holding: reversed and remanded
Decision: Decision: 9 votes for Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University, 0 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)