Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Docket No.: 96-243
Argued: February 26, 1997
Decided: May 27, 1997

Topics:

Due Process, Takings Clause, Administrative Procedure, Article I, Civil Procedure, Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, judicial review, patent

PartyNames: Bernadine SUITUM, Petitioner, v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY.
Petitioner: Suitum
Respondent: Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 80 F.3d 359
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket

Suitum
v.
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
520 U.S. 725 (1997)
Other Citations: 117 S.Ct. 1659137 L.Ed.2d 980 (520 U.S.
Question:

Must property owners attempt to sell their developmental rights before claiming the regulatory taking of property without just compensation, in accordance with the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
ORAL ARGUMENT

February 26, 1997

Holding: vacated and remanded
Decision: Decision: 9 votes for Suitum, 0 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)