Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Brown v. Pro Football Inc.

Docket No.: 95-388
Argued: March 27, 1996
Decided: June 20, 1996

Topics:

Economic Activity, Antitrust, Antitrust, Collective Bargaining, NLRA, Sherman Act, antitrust, conditions of employment, patent, rule of reason

PartyNames: BROWN, et al. v. PRO FOOTBALL, INC., DBA WASHINGTON REDSKINS, et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Petitioner: Brown
Respondent: Pro Football Inc.

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Citation: 50 F.3d 1041
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket

Brown
v.
Pro Football Inc.
518 U.S. 231 (1996)
Other Citations: 116 S.Ct. 2116135 L.Ed.2d 521 (518 U.S.
Question:

Are several employers immune from a union anti-trust suit when these employers, bargaining together, unilaterally impose terms on the union if the collective bargaining process reaches an impasse?

Brown v. Pro Football Inc.
ORAL ARGUMENT

March 27, 1996

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 8 votes for Pro Football Inc., 1 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)