Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

Carlisle v. United States

Docket No.: 94-9247
Argued: January 16, 1996
Decided: April 19, 1996

Topics:

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court), Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Appellate Procedure, Article I, Civil Procedure, Double Jeopardy, Due Process, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Fifth Amendment, antitrust, habeas, habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel, patent

PartyNames: CARLISLE v. UNITED STATES Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Petitioner: Carlisle
Respondent: United States

Court Below: THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Citation: 48 F.3d 190
Lower Court Decision
Supreme Court Docket

Carlisle
v.
United States
517 U.S. 416 (1996)
Other Citations: 116 S.Ct. 1460134 L.Ed.2d 613 (517 U.S.
Question:

Does a district court have the authority to grant a post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal if the motion is filed beyond the seven-day deadline prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c)?

Carlisle v. United States
ORAL ARGUMENT

January 16, 1996

Holding: affirmed
Decision: Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Database Connection failed: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'restauz8_sophi'@'localhost' (using password: YES)