Home Menu ↓
Clicking on our sponsor links helps insure continued free access to this website.
Please support our efforts by visiting our sponsors:

 

HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. CALIFORNIA

Docket No.: 91-1111
Argued: February 23, 1993
Decided: June 28, 1993
Consolidated with: No. 91-1128

Topics:

15 U.S.C. 1012, Economic Activity, Antitrust, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, Antitrust, Article I, Civil Rights Act, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Comity, Commerce Clause, National Labor Relations Act, Sherman Act, Title VII, antitrust, concerted activity, resale price maintenance, retaliation

PartyNames: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. et al. v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Petitioner: Hartford Fire Insurance Co. et al.
Respondent: California et al.

Court Below: The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Citation: 938 F. 2d 919
Supreme Court Docket

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. et al.
v.
California et al.
509 U.S. 764 (1993)
Other Citations: (113 S.Ct. 2891, 125 L.Ed.2d 612)
Question:

First, did the plaintiffs sufficiently allege "boycotts," as used in the McCarran-Ferguson Act, Section 3(b)? Second, did international comity counsel against exercising Sherman Act jurisdiction over the conduct of the London- based defendants?

HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. CALIFORNIA
ORAL ARGUMENT

February 23, 1993

Holding: affirmed in part, reversed in
Decision: Decision: 5 votes for Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 4 vote(s) against
Vote: 9-0
Opinion By:

HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. CALIFORNIA
Case Documents

1Opinion in HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. CALIFORNIA
2Opinion in HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. v. CALIFORNIA
Additional documents for this case are pending review.